LOL, you gave me nothing to expand on, your post was wholly lacking policy specifics. Would you like to discuss a specific policy like Harris's attack this weekend on X for allowing free speech that is legal under the 1s Amendment, and thus with which the government is barred from interfering with?
LOL, you gave me nothing to expand on, your post was wholly lacking policy specifics. Would you like to discuss a specific policy like Harris's attack this weekend on X for allowing free speech that is legal under the 1s Amendment, and thus with which the government is barred from interfering with?
I gave you nothing because I... wasn't talking to you lol. You also were replying to the content of the article, which you seem to have a problem with, only no now you want me to feed you talking points to be shrill about.
But sure if you want to talk about an alleged attack on Harris, go for it, I'm all ears. After that we can talk about how Elon the Free Speech Absolutist so far has an 80% compliance rate with speech restriction requests from authoritarian governments.
1) You came here unprompted and made incendiary comments
2) You immediately tried to deflect instead of making an entire point, presumably because you had none.
3) You then pulled in something that had nothing to do with the article we're both commenting on, nothing to do with your earlier comments, and refused even to defend that more than one level deep.
4) You shared an article from a dude who thinks Trump was the victim of a "palace coup" as your source of unbiased journalism.
You know if I didnтАЩt know better, IтАЩd say banning me from your little echo chamber was a tantrum, which I have on good authority Real Men donтАЩt have. Come here to play any time, cupcake. You are adorable.
LOL, you gave me nothing to expand on, your post was wholly lacking policy specifics. Would you like to discuss a specific policy like Harris's attack this weekend on X for allowing free speech that is legal under the 1s Amendment, and thus with which the government is barred from interfering with?
I gave you nothing because I... wasn't talking to you lol. You also were replying to the content of the article, which you seem to have a problem with, only no now you want me to feed you talking points to be shrill about.
But sure if you want to talk about an alleged attack on Harris, go for it, I'm all ears. After that we can talk about how Elon the Free Speech Absolutist so far has an 80% compliance rate with speech restriction requests from authoritarian governments.
Read this and learn something you highly indoctrinated partisan.
https://www.racket.news/p/liberalism-removes-its-mask
So just to verify:
1) You came here unprompted and made incendiary comments
2) You immediately tried to deflect instead of making an entire point, presumably because you had none.
3) You then pulled in something that had nothing to do with the article we're both commenting on, nothing to do with your earlier comments, and refused even to defend that more than one level deep.
4) You shared an article from a dude who thinks Trump was the victim of a "palace coup" as your source of unbiased journalism.
And through all this... I'm the partisan?
You know if I didnтАЩt know better, IтАЩd say banning me from your little echo chamber was a tantrum, which I have on good authority Real Men donтАЩt have. Come here to play any time, cupcake. You are adorable.